[enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?
Rui Ribeiro racribeiro at gmail.com
Tue Jul 7 19:47:15 CEST 2009
Hi all, Thanks for your unvaluable feedback! >> Unless two two have a peering agreement by chance, the call will go >> VoIP -> PSTN Gateway -> PSTN Gateway -> VoIP. How stupid is that? > One simple answer: it works. Anything else currently does not work (at least, from a practical point of view). It is stupid, but needed... many operators (even VoIP) don't allow to go outside their own "SIP Island". What could be the drive to "open" their island to "overseas" conections? > Surprisingly enough, MS seems to be pushing heavily towards > reliable public VoIP (what they are calling "ocs federation" I > believe). They could benefit from ENUM. The "ocs federation" will not support ENUM, i'm sure. OCS uses some kind of SIP, but not really interoperable with "off the shelf, white brand, SIP systems". In fact you have to have a gateway to SIP... from my testing, a few months ago, it doesn't allow to make calls using URI's outside the federation and the numbers are always routed through the gateways (SIP, ISDN or others). It seems like a way to make "archipelagos", than to provide a global public VoIP system. Rui Ribeiro racribeiro at gmail.com
[ enum-wg Archives ]