[#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?
Antoin Verschuren Antoin.Verschuren at sidn.nl
Wed Jul 1 17:20:08 CEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > -----Original Message----- > From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fweimer at bfk.de] > Subject: Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business > case matter? > > PS: Two of the three 1.3.e164.arpa name servers are lame. Hmm, not 2 out of 3 at the same time, 1 out of 3 according to DNSMON. We had maintenance on our ENUM nameservers, moving them around and preparing some other stuff.. I'll have an announcement on why in a few days. Everything should be working again now. Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Utrechtseweg 310, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 F: +31 26 3525505 M: +31 6 23368970 mailto:antoin.verschuren at sidn.nl xmpp:antoin at jabber.sidn.nl http://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wsBVAwUBSkt+qDqHrM883AgnAQirtAgA1qpD/yUjKacct2HD+Xg25g+9oS0mVUrX 9PsSZt5ZjeS7/Z4Ng4l5OsMzBRcX5xzP7HkJzNVlQI2ej/Nch0G7kMuMbEc0gymA nCjiw6r5azMAb9492jRn+o4qcEs9U8edvWh/hujCRIuL8idXWPpHfHp9XtlPxK0K oSK5lr1iVUtI4oZ8sYS6X0X13y3JBuvguh/ZjLCd3pRy+IvPaXkSBj7BIEDxCLWx lL6H8i4h6EioRf/0mFY8lrMNkKeLmp6RTPz1Rgy3ngTIPRHxbcZUZ8zr7XQ33r7u VJ+m0QPyH8JE7aJQiKaDjBtoejbDNRG7tmPUCjldssnUiMfCLloDQA== =B4m7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ enum-wg Archives ]