[enum-wg] 4.4.e164.arpa

Hi Christian

What's the obvious reason? :-)

Saw this on list and one of the Directors brought it up in our board meeting
earlier today too... And I had the esteemed chair of this WG email me
directly too. Nice to see there are people out there who care about us.. and
thanks for bringing it to pur attention.

I am pretty certain this was sorted out quite a while ago.. in any case, our
secretariat are on the case and it will be resolved in the new year..

FWIW, the delegation of the responsibility for ENUM in the UK is with
BIS/UKEC, and in turn, UKEC tendered a contract to Nominet to provide the
registry services.

Regards
Denesh
UKEC Director

2009/12/21 Christian de Larrinaga <cdel at firsthand.net>

> Jim thanks. I wanted to ask here (RIPE WG) before UKEC for obvious reasons.
>
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Christian
>
> On 21 Dec 2009, at 12:36, Jim Reid wrote:
>
> > On 21 Dec 2009, at 11:29, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
> >
> >> It shows 44 UK as delegated to DTI/Nominum as of 16/05/02
> >>
> >> Is this the correct official status of this zone?
> >
> > The definitive status of this zone should be what's in the Tier-0
> registry. But the information in the RIPE NCC's database is defective too.
> [A whois query returns incorrect info for the admin contact and claims I'm
> the technical and zone contact. Which I'm not...] I believe this was updated
> when things were transitioned to UKEC. So it's strange that some sort of
> time warp has put the clock back to an earlier era.
> >
> > Since UKEC control the domain's maintainer object, corrections to the NCC
> database will be for UKEC to resolve. They're the official body overseeing
> ENUM in the UK and your questions should be directed to them, not this list.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/enum-wg/attachments/20091221/988f7273/attachment.html>