[enum-wg] Session scheduling for RIPE 55 (and future): ENUM vs AP

On 21 Jun 2007, at 13:07, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> ACTION 54.3: Niall O'Reilly to ask mailing list about having the  
> ENUM WG session
> in parallel with the AP WG session at future RIPE Meetings.
>
> 	Please speak up, anyone for whom simultaneous scheduling of ENUM and
> 	Address Policy WG sessions would be a problem.

	Due to the deafening response, I believe it's appropriate to declare  
this
	action item "closed" and to let the chairs of the other working groups
	know that we in the ENUM WG don't see parallel scheduling with AP WG as
	a problem.


Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly
Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/enum-wg/attachments/20071022/4d755b37/attachment.sig>