[enum-wg] ENUM RFC insight
Stastny Richard Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at
Thu Sep 28 12:55:52 CEST 2006
> 1. In order to comply with ENUM do you MUST have any NAPTR with an "s" > flag > somewhere on the resolution tree? NO RFC3761 only allows NAPTR with "u" or "" > 2. It is a good practice (or is it a MUST to) had the NAPTR "s" flag to the > domain? [RFC3263] The "s" NAPTRs are in the domain where the ENUM URI is pointing to Richard > -----Original Message----- > From: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of > Rui Ribeiro > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:28 PM > To: enum-wg at ripe.net > Cc: wg-multimedia at fccn.pt > Subject: [enum-wg] ENUM RFC insight > > Hi all, > > We are having some dificulties with a manufacturer of equipment in order > to > put ENUM queries working. > > The manufacturer says that the in order to comply with ENUM we must use > NAPTR with "s". They have exemplified as: > > $ORIGIN 1.1.1.1.1.5.3.e164.arpa. > 1.1.7.3 IN NAPTR 101 50 "u" "sip+E2U" "!^.*$!sip:3711 at foo.com!i" > 4.1.7.3 IN NAPTR 101 50 "s" "sip+D2U" "" _sip._udp.sip.server.foo.com. > IN NAPTR 101 50 "s" "sip+D2T" "" _sip._tdp.sip.server.foo.com. > > Although I understand how this may work, in fact the 3711 extension will > not > work by it self since the system don't use the SRV RR for URI dialling > (SRVs > are in place). They have proposed the 3714 extension solution instead. > This > may work to some, but for sure, not to all destinations. > > In RFC 3403 (Page 8) there is reference that suggests that one must add, > next to the SRV records for a domain, the following. > > $ORIGIN foo.com. > IN NAPTR 100 50 "s" "sip+D2U" "" sip.server.foo.com. > IN NAPTR 100 50 "s" "sip+D2T" "" sip.server.foo.com. > > The "million dollar" questions. > > 1. In order to comply with ENUM do you MUST have any NAPTR with an "s" > flag > somewhere on the resolution tree? > 2. It is a good pratice (or is it a MUST to) had the NAPTR "s" flag to the > domain? [RFC3263] > 3. What are the current (offical) way to describe services "sip+D2U" or > "D2U+sip"? [RFC3263 vs RFC4415/RFC3761] > > Thanks for your help. > > Rui Ribeiro > racr at fccn.pt
[ enum-wg Archives ]