[enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385]

Dear Antoin,

It is certainly possible to add a new organisation object type, 
like "ENUM", to be specifically used by the ENUM registries. 
This would involve the changes to the RIPE Database.

I suggest you to contact ENUM-WG and DB-WG working group chairs 
to check first whether this change would require 
only a mailing list consensus or PDP, and then maybe put together 
a proposal for ENUM-WG and DB-WG and submit it to the appropriate
mailing lists.

-- 
Katie Petrusha
RIPE NCC

> > From: "Antoin Verschuren" <Antoin.Verschuren at sidn.nl>
> > Date: 4 September 2006 2:26:40PM GMT+02:00
> > To: <enum-wg at ripe.net>
> > Cc: <ncc-services-wg at ripe.net>
> > Subject: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385
> > Message-Id: <B33086268D53A0429A3AA2774C83892CDC5850 at KAEVS1.SIDN.local>
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request forms as I
> > found out when I had to use them last week.
> >
> > The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation holding the
> > registration.
> >
> > This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field.
> > RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field.
> >
> > I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR world,  
> > but I
> > do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading as we are the registry
> > for .nl  and soon hopefully for ENUM.
> >
> > Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 registries  
> > here
> > ?
> >
> > Antoin Verschuren
> >
> > Technical Advisor
> > Policy & Business Development
> > SIDN
> > Utrechtseweg 310
> > PO Box 5022
> > 6802 EA Arnhem
> > The Netherlands
> >
> > T +31 26 3525510
> > F +31 26 3525505
> > M +31 6 23368970
> > E antoin.verschuren at sidn.nl
> > W http://www.sidn.nl/