[enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type

On 9 Oct 2006, at 15:48, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> Dmitriy V Menzulskiy wrote:
>> Alireza Saleh написано 04.10.2006 12:23:44:
>>  > ENUM-REGISTRY or any other terms is good, but, I think it would be
>>  > better to follow the hierarchy model. Having REGISTRY at the  
>> top and
>>  > more specific label such as org-detail: to describe the what  
>> kind of
>>  > registry  as a child.
>> I think, it's good idea:
>> REGISTRY-IANA
>> REGISTRY-RIR
>> REGISTRY-NIR
>> REGISTRY-LIR
>> REGISTRY-ENUM
>> REGISTRY-OTHER
>> NON-REGISTRY
>> WBR,
>> Dmitry Menzulskiy
>> "VimpelCom" JSC
>> DM3740-RIPE
>
> I believe we should keep things as simple as possible - and  
> according to what's been discussed here on the list and during the  
> session last week, the proposed "OTHER" seems to address  
> everybody's need.

Actually, we MUST keep things as simple as possible.

We're dealing with a real, existing database, not with a design  
exercise.
Antoin's proposal is what's on the table: 'OTHER' in place of 'NON- 
REGISTRY'.
Discussion of what would be "better" or a "good idea" is out of scope.


Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly
Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group