[enum-wg] Follow up on Jim Reid's presentation - CRUE and relation to IETF work

> On Apr 28, 2006, at 09:51, Stastny Richard wrote:
...
>> JWhat Michael wanted to say is that the temporary solution defined in
...
>
> If you're referring to draft-haberler-carrier-enum-02.txt, I think   you
> are being far, far too optimistic. This draft is badly flawed in   too
> many ways to elaborate here. A discussion on that belongs in   another

Jim -

we're all very very eager to hear and discuss your most helpful
contributions.

Help make the world a better place and stamp out such badly flawed drafts.

To do so, please:

a) detail your concerns on the IETF ENUM WG list (that's where this stuff
is being discussed)
b) in time (that is, like half a year ago, but late adopters welcome)
c) including facts, so you actually convince people
d) [optional] make a better proposal (those which yield a really loud hum).

I'll support you on your superior superior proposal.

-Michael