[enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01

I support the desire to standardize ENUM provisioning interfaces between 
Tier 2 to Tier 1, and would like specifications around this to share 
with the CC1 ENUM LLC. The RFP that they will be developing for the Tier 
1 registry should be based on a common interface to the extent possible.
Some of this is documented in the US ENUM Forum requirements, but 
identifying a wider standardization than US/North America in preferred.
_ _

Robert W Schafer, MCI Network Architecture & Standards
2400 N Glenville Dr,Richardson,TX 75082/Ofc +1972 7296125
This message is privileged, confidential and not for
public use. If received in error, please delete it.
_ _

Adrian Georgescu wrote:
> Hello Bernie,
> 
> 1. There is interest in EPP provisioning from Tier 2 to Tier1. So far 
> there are at least 3 implementations I know of (AU, PL and CH) and 
> standardizing such interfaces is a very good thing
> 
> 2. It would have been very useful if you would have come to the ENUM 
> Plugtest held by ETSI last week
> 
> I will look at your implementation and hopeful we can build a client to 
> test with your implementation. The lack of feedback is caused mostly by 
> the slow speed of ENUM adoption in the regulatory area. Your work is 
> definitely not in vain, you are yet another early bird with a wonderful 
> ENUM system that WORKS !
> 
> Adrian
> 
> On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>>
>> As some of you know, in the IETF, there is some work on-going 
>> concerning ENUM and validation of E.164 numbers. At the IETF-62 in 
>> Minneapolis.
>> the draft referred below has been approved as a Working Group item of 
>> the IETF ENUM WG:
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>    This document describes an EPP extension framework for mapping
>>    information about the validation process that has been applied for
>>    the E.164 number (or number range), which the ENUM domain name is
>>    based on.  Specified in XML, this mapping extends the EPP domain name
>>    mapping to provide an additional feature required for the
>>    provisioning of ENUM domain names.
>>
>> URLs
>>
>>   * http://ietf.hoeneisen.ch/draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01.txt
>>   * http://ietf.hoeneisen.ch/draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01.html
>>
>> In Switzerland we are running an EPP Server including this extension 
>> for the ENUM Tier-1 Registry. So far we did not run into any trouble.
>>
>> I am about to write an update of this draft. So far I have not 
>> received any feedback. Does this mean, that everything in there is 
>> just fine or that people are not interested / have not read it at all? 
>> ;-)
>>
>> Besides the technical and other feedback, I'd be interested:
>> - Who is planning to use this EPP extension for ENUM?
>> - Who cannot use this extensions and what are the reasons?
>>
>> Looking forward for lots of comments!
>>
>> cheers,
>>  Bernie Hoeneisen, Switch, Project Manager ENUM