[enum-wg] ITU: debate over User-ENUM administration

On 8 Feb 2005, at 10:22, Jim Reid wrote:

> So "ENUM has nothing to do with assignment of E.164 numbers or
> national number plans", does it? What drugs are you on and where can I
> get some? :-)

I'm missing something here.  I'm surprised by this reaction, one of a 
couple
I've seen, each from someone whose clue-level I respect, and each saying
more or less the same thing.

It seems it's time for me to have a 'booster-shot' of clue.  I may not 
be
the only one on the list who would benefit.  Please do it gently!

As I understood things, Christian's statement is _formally_ correct,
since ENUM is for embedding _already-assigned_ E.164 numbers in the DNS.

Or?

Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly

PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9