[enum-wg] ITU: debate over User-ENUM administration
Richard Shockey richard at shockey.us
Sat Feb 5 20:28:35 CET 2005
> >Hi. > >I wonder how you (or we) should define "progress"? We start >with an area that was originally agreed to be an IETF >responsibility with TSB participation on >authorization/validation issues. It then "evolves", at SG2 >insistence, to something that is assumed to involve at least >some topics we should discuss together. And now we have >attained the pinnacle of a discussion within SG2, >apparently-secret from the outside world, based on documents >that are not generally available to the IETF and the ENUM user >community. > >And, of course, unless ITU-T SG2 is planning to disrupt the >Internet by setting up an alternate root, their deciding on an >ENUM TLD is only slightly more likely to be relevant than their >passing a Recommendation that changes the speed of light. > >Leslie, Scott, can these documents be obtained and released to >the IETF ENUM WG and interested members of the community so that >we can further evaluate the level of progress? Attached ... However considering the source of these documents ..the well known Permanant Delegate of Syria to the ITU I'm not overly concerned about their impact, but this requires careful monitoring. John I'm in total agreement the principle that the price of the Internet freedom is eternal vigilance . I have some ... some ..confidence in SG-2 management to "do the right thing" here and in any event. IMHO the most important task for the global ENUM community to accomplish is getting the delegation for 1.e164.arpa to North America ASAP and commence short lived trials that will lead to commercial deployment. Once that is done I think we would have sent a message that e164.apra is real and that further discussions on the matter of a different root are futile. That process is well underway.. discussions over how the ENUM LLC management entity will act are taking place almost weekly . I'm also very confident that there well be responsible,open ,and competitive bidding processes for both the US and Canadian portions of the NANP within the late 2005 very early 2006 time frame. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ccTLD T05-SG02-050216-D-0022!!MSW-E.doc Type: application/msword Size: 54784 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/enum-wg/attachments/20050205/a9cbdca0/attachment.doc> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ENUM T05-SG02-050216-D-0020!!MSW-E.doc Type: application/msword Size: 68608 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/enum-wg/attachments/20050205/a9cbdca0/attachment-0001.doc>
[ enum-wg Archives ]