AW: [enum-wg] Kapsch CarrierCom first company to be reached with ENUM (questionable)

strange.
I had a quick look at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt and it reads:

	Network Working Group                                       J. Rosenberg
	Request for Comments: 3261                                   dynamicsoft
	Obsoletes: 2543                                           H. Schulzrinne
	Category: Standards Track                                    ...
            	                                                   June 2002
                    SIP: Session Initiation Protocol

no mention of ENUM.

also, I work in a company that has ENUM enabled.  You can call me (+49 7031 73009) via ENUM from the internet and I certainly have no SIP URI.  Same goes true for a number of our customers I know of, which are using ENUM in their telephony production environment.  

Do I miss something or is this thread falsely mixing up only loosely coupled issues?

Regards, Christoph


-----Original Message-----
From: Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) [mailto:lwc at roke.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:53 PM
To: Adrian Georgescu
Cc: Stastny Richard; Carsten Schiefner; Henry Sinnreich; <enum-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [enum-wg] Kapsch CarrierCom first company to be reached with
ENUM

Hi Guys,
   quick point here - ENUM is according to RFC3261.
It's AKA "public" ENUM. It *is* available on the Internet.
Anything else is "ENUM-like".
 
>> So Henry says (and I agree), if you do not have a SIP URI, you do not 
>> have VoIP.