[enum-wg] Kapsch CarrierCom first company to be reached with ENUM

Jakob, folks,
Tempting as it is to utter a two word response,
there is a well known issue with 3264 - to "allow
backwards compatibility" (i.e. not make a certain
large Router manufacturer's kit obsolescent overnight),
you can use sip+E2U as well, so ETSI versus IETF is
the least of your problems.

We now return you to the adverts.

Lawrence

On 6 Oct 2004, at 13:27, Michael Haberler wrote:

> At 14:15 06.10.2004, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to see people deploying this, especially for companies.
>>
>> on the technical side, do you know why Kapsch uses non-standard NAPTR 
>> like E2U+voice:sip instead of the one specified by RFC 3764 
>> (E2U+sip)?
>>
>>         jakob
>
> no religious issues here;) the fix as per above is in the code waiting 
> for the next build
>
> -Michael