AW: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...

At 08:24 AM 12/12/2004, John-Erik Horn wrote:



>I wouldn't consider that to be a problem
>but a benefit.  Just because the TSPs registerthe ENUM domains and
>administer the zone data, does not mean that will keep them from
>offering a front-end for users/customers. They will be forced to
>do that for reasons of rationality. Think of the workload if a TSP had
>a call center up and running just to get everybody's data into the
>DNS/ENUM-system.
>
>Carrier-based ENUM is probably the easiest (maybe not the best)
>way to protect the privacy of customer data.

Which BTW is why it is a good idea to keep it out of e164.arpa

Now since our ICANN folks have just approved .MOBI ..maybe the carriers 
will go back to the ITU and get e164.int and we can end this issue once and 
for all.


>Greetings
>
>John-Erik Horn
>VoIP Project Manager
>toplink-plannet GmbH
>Schönfeldstraße 8
>76131 Karlsruhe
>Tel: +49-721-663-6450
>Fax: +49-721-663-6199





> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-admin at ripe.net]
> > Im Auftrag von Stastny Richard
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. Dezember 2004 18:28
> > An: Andrzej Bartosiewicz; Carsten Schiefner
> > Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net
> > Betreff: Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...
> >
> > >BTW: Access to the production system is restricted to the TSPs with
> > >officially assigned numering blocks by "Office of Telecommunications
> > >and Post Regulation" in Poland.
> >
> > There is only one "minor" problem with the implementation in Poland:
> > It is Carrier E**M in e164.arpa
> > -richard
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > Von: enum-wg-admin at ripe.net im Auftrag von Andrzej Bartosiewicz
> > Gesendet: Sa 11.12.2004 16:55
> > An: Carsten Schiefner
> > Cc: enum-wg at ripe.net
> > Betreff: Re: [enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...
> >
> >
> >
> > Carsten,
> >
> > The answer is: Yes. We have switched over to production 6
> > months ago. You missed my presentation in Sophia Antipolis... :)
> >
> > Every TSP in Poland with assigned numbering block may sign
> > the contract with NASK and start the registration of ENUM
> > domain names in 8.4.e164.arpa (5 EURO/year).
> >
> > BTW: Access to the production system is restricted to the
> > TSPs with officially assigned numering blocks by "Office of
> > Telecommunications and Post Regulation" in Poland. We also
> > have the "testing" system, so everybody (not only TSPs) can
> > test the full functionality. The only difference is that we
> > do not export domain names to zone file from the "testing"
> > system.
> >
> > Andrzej.
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrzej,
> > >
> > > thanks for the link - on p. 4 it reads: "Production
> > registry launch:
> > > May 19, 2004".
> > >
> > > Did I completely miss a according announcement on all of my ENUM
> > > related lists (and there are some! ;-) or did NASK switch over to
> > > production in absolute silence?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > >       -C.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >


 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683,  Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<