[enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...
Richard Shockey richard at shockey.us
Mon Dec 13 22:05:47 CET 2004
At 04:53 AM 12/13/2004, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote: >Richard, > > > This IMHO will cause Poland a problem over time as ISP who want to sell > > advanced services then realize they have to go through the incumbent to get > > registrations processed. But this is as we all know is a national matter > > and seeing how Poland deals with this will be very interesting to watch. > >Are you a fortune-teller? We already have this problem! >For example some of our ISP (and acting as ".pl" Registrars too) are >interested in ENUM domains registration (for VoIP services) but they MUST go >through TSPs. And telcos are not interested to start ENUM domains >registration... (they are also slowing down the NP implementation, so nobody >expects special interest in ENUM). another Capt. Louis Renault magic moment "I'm shocked shocked .. telecos do not want to enable VoIP or LNP! :-) " >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/enum-wg/attachments/20041213/330ce541/attachment.html>
[ enum-wg Archives ]