[enum-wg] repost: Proposal for non-geographic ENUM E.164 UPTS for the general public

hi!

> How is this proposed +8787 different from the current +87810? (Other 
> then the goverance portion?)

visionng is set up as an organization to support its members. this is a 
different approach than the one of the RIRs which is aimed at the 
community of all internet users.
visionng's aim is to support a set of specific technical solutions, it 
requires its members to adopt a specific technical framework that has 
been decided upon in the visionng context. the number space was probably 
requested by visionng because of the lack of available non geographic 
upts, managing such a number resource for the general public wasn't the 
aim. visionng does not actually focus on voip or the ip part alone, but 
also on PSTN networks and technology.
also, i guess compared to the RIRs visionng generally cannot be seen as 
an open organization, it is not aimed at and probably can not provide 
for upts for the general public. visionng seems to be somebody who could 
profit from the proposed setup, as the numbers would be portable to and 
from pstn of visionng members.
but if you wish to know more about visionng, it's certainly a beter idea 
to ask richard stasny.

kind regards,

	Chris Heinze