[enum-wg] New Subject: What ENUM wg should do...

On Aug 10, 2004, at 01:49, James Seng wrote:

> IETF or RIPE WG? I'm all for it for the latter.

RIPE-WG.

   paf

>
> -James Seng
>
> Jim Reid wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "paf" == =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <ISO-8859-1> 
>>>>>>> writes:
>>     paf> One of the things Kim and I have planned for this wg is to
>>     paf> keep a webpage updated with, for each CC/country, answers to
>>     paf> questions on what rules exists for various things -- one of
>>     paf> them being how integration of E.164 numbers is...
>>     paf> Does this sound like a "good thing for this wg to do"?
>> YES!