james
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrzej Bartosiewicz" andrzejb@localhost
To: "Patrik Fältström" paf@localhost
Cc: "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" lwc@localhost; "Stastny Richard"
<Richard.Stastny@localhost; enum-trials@localhost
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: ENUM domain names in Poland.
I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.
yes, we are still using 2916 format for NAPTR RRs
My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format
for
a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.
i think it's good idea to support both 2916/2916bis for a while. for
example
our "look-up" & "phone book" applications are still based on rfc2916:
www.dns.pl/cgi-bin/en_enum_lookup.pl
www.dns.pl/ENUM/enumClient.zip
andrzej
paf
On Mar 31, 2004, at 01:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
looking at the first number (+48225231300) , I note that the ENUM
data
is broken.
The service field is "mailto+E2U" - in RFC2916bis the E2U goes at
the
start of
the field, NOT the end.
Likewise for the second number.
Sigh.
See ETSI's TS 102 172 for the ETSI spec on Interoperability of
European trials.
all the best,
Lawrence
----
On 29 Mar 2004, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
We are using this domain names for testing in Poland.
Please, do not call me and my friends in the middle of the night...
;)
Andrzej.
0.0.3.1.3.2.5.2.2.8.4.e164.arpa
0.2.9.7.5.0.0.0.6.8.4.e164.arpa
<snip>