Re: ENUM domain names in Poland

["Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" <]

On 31 Mar 2004, at 10:00 am, Carsten Schiefner wrote:

> Hi Patrik,
>
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= wrote:
> > I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.
> >
> > My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format  
> > for
> > a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.
> as in:
>
> http://www.noris.net/cgi-bin/dig? 
> fqdn=2.5.4.1.4.5.8.0.3.9.4.e164.arpa&type=AXFR&server=toybox.amsterdamn 
> ed.org
>
> ? Don't know whether I got the prios/prefs right, though...
>
> 	-C.
Hi Folks,
  I sympathise with the mess we're in due to the glacial progress of  
RFC2916bis.
(BTW, I think the order/pref are correct in the example).
This example will work fine, but it does mean we double the size of the  
DNS reply.

Thus it's only "easy" for those folks having a single contact -  
remember that
some of the old clients only use UDP queries (without EDNS0 support).

atb,
  Lawrence