Re: ENUM domain names in Poland.

[James Seng <]

Actually on our side, we have moved totally to 2916bis.

-James Seng

Patrik Fältström wrote:
> I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.
>
> My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format for 
> a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.
>
>    paf
>
> On Mar 31, 2004, at 01:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrzej,
> > looking at the first number (+48225231300) , I note that the ENUM data 
> > is broken.
> >
> > The service field is "mailto+E2U" - in RFC2916bis the E2U goes at the 
> > start of
> > the field, NOT the end.
> >
> > Likewise for the second number.
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> > See ETSI's TS 102 172 for the ETSI spec on Interoperability of 
> > European trials.
> >
> > all the best,
> >   Lawrence
> >
> > ----
> > On 29 Mar 2004, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
> > We are using this domain names for testing in Poland.
> >
> > Please, do not call me and my friends in the middle of the night... ;)
> >
> > Andrzej.
> >
> > 0.0.3.1.3.2.5.2.2.8.4.e164.arpa
> > 0.2.9.7.5.0.0.0.6.8.4.e164.arpa
> > <snip>