[eix-wg] [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Draft Document Published (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
chrish at consol.net chrish at consol.net
Mon Apr 2 13:38:11 CEST 2012
hi! On 04/02/2012 01:13 PM, Sascha Luck wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:10PM +0200, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > >> Good to hear that the working group affected is supporting the proposal. >> Perhaps this is the most important. > > What is the current status of organisations wrt the PDP? I remember a shitstorm about that in a different context (2007-01?). > IIRC the outcome was that organisations don't get a say except through > their individual members? ripe represents the community - the plenum being the sum of the individual persons. identifying a commercial IXP syndication as 'the most important' player regarding the question whether IXPs should be treated special regarding commons of the community is in my eyes - errr - "amazing" :) regards, Chris
[ eix-wg Archives ]