[dp-tf] Quadlogy of person proposals

Leo Vegoda wrote:

> On 15 Jun 2007, at 4:26pm, Denis Walker wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> This is why I think we should focus attention first of all on these
>> questions. But I don't think this is a simple as it looks. Maybe the
>> original wording of policies said we need contact information for
>> troubleshooting. The world has moved on a lot since then. Now
>> accountability is also important. Governments and LEAs want to know
>> "who" is responsible for Internet resources.
> 
> 
> I agree.
> 
>> A faceless role object will
>> not be good enough.
> 
> 
> I doubt person objects would be, either. That's what organisation 
> objects, do.

Maybe, but in many cases it would simply shift the problem from the left
hand to the right hand. Take my case at home:

I have been assigned 8 addresses for my ADSL connection by my Telekom Op.

With your approach I could easily hide my personal contact information
because that can/has to go into "my" organisation: object. In the end it
is the same set of (personal) information under a different heading.

If that approach gets us out from unerneath the PD rules, fine with me :-)
But I am not convinced...

> Regards,
> 
>--
>Leo Vegoda
>IANA Numbers Liaison

Wilfried.