[dnssec-key-tf] do we need to do anything for RIPE59?

On Sep 29, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Jim Reid wrote:

> Colleagues, our task force is not quite dead. And not quite alive.  
> You might recall that we put it into hibernation because the IANA  
> ITAR was about to be created. There was an unofficial action item to  
> revive the task force at some point and assess how well the IANA  
> ITAR met the characteristics that we developed last year:  
> neutrality, processes and so on.
>
> I'd like to be able to report some sort of progress to the WG in  
> Lisbon. My personal preference would be to declare victory and  
> disband the task force. However, this is not my decision to make. So  
> can I ask you all for your views on the following?
>
> [1] Can we discuss the IANA ITAR on this list and reach a decision?

I don't see the point. What would be the gain? itar exists, does the  
job.

> [2] Is the IANA ITAR "good enough" for us to consider the TF's work  
> done?

Yes.

> [3] Should we try to physically meet in Lisbon before the WG on  
> Thursday?

I might not be there.

> [4] Should we open up an Action Item for the WG to review the IANA  
> ITAR?

No.

> [5] Are there any other options or strategies I've overlooked?

To some up, I agree with you that we should declare victory and  
disband the task force.

Roy