[dnssec-key-tf] physical meeting at RIPE 55- again!

On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Jim Reid wrote:

> On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:46, Marcos Sanz/Denic wrote:
>
>> Provided the current conversation dynamics (and I know I haven't
>> contributed to it that much so far), it wouldn't be bad to meet in  
>> person.
>> It's always possible to cancel the reservation, if later on we  
>> realize
>> it's become unnecessary, isn't it?
>
> Yes and no. First off Nick Hyrka wants to publish our TF meeting in  
> the overall meeting plan. That would allow anyone to come along and  
> "observe": a Fine Thing. However it would look bad if that TF  
> meeting didn't take place or was cancelled: some conspiracy  
> theorists might make noise about smoke-filled rooms and black  
> helicopters. Next, if meeting space is in short supply, I would be  
> a little uncomfortable if we reserve a room and deny some other  
> worthy cause the opportunity of using it if the TF later decides  
> not to meet.
>
> This is why I would like us to make a clear decision. And if we  
> decide to meet at RIPE 55, what are we going to discuss? What would  
> an agenda for that meeting look like? Given the low traffic on the  
> list to date, I'm not sure if there is enough justification to meet  
> in person. OTOH, perhaps a physical meeting is the thing that's  
> needed to get this TF to make progress. I would like the TF to make  
> a decision about that. Soon. :-)

I do like to meet in person. Lets use Peter's aggregated list of  
topics, and extend it.

Roy