[dnssec-key-tf] slides for the WG this afternoon

On 24.10 11:26, Jim Reid wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:54, Peter Koch wrote:
> 
> >1) "TAR should somehow reflect DNS hierarchy"
> >   Maybe I misread this, but I recall we were in agreement that the  
> >TAR
> >   should be inherently flat, i.e., TLD only (esp. given that ARPA  
> >will
> >   probably be signed soon)
> 
> We were in agreement about that, but the bullet point was about  
> something else: namely that a TAR shouldn't diverge from the model we  
> have for managing the DNS or give rise to an alternate trust hierarchy.
> 
> Daniel had a good phrase for this which escapes me right now: perhaps  
> someone could jog my memory?

I do not now which point you want my alnguage on. 

1) Not building DNSSEC trust hierarchies that diverge from the DNS delegation hierarchy.

2) TLDs and equivalent infrastructure domains like  in-addr.arpa and e-164.arpa. 
   (and that point may be moot sson)

Does that help.

> 
> >2) "Need open publication format (XML-ish?) ..."
> >   Rather than mentioning the ultimate obvious format, perhaps you  
> >could
> >   loosely refer to IETF work going on in that area, which the TAR  
> >should
> >   take into consideration.
> 
> OK.

i'll try to find it before the session starts

> 
> >I trust that the "layer 9" issues with the TAR at IANA bypassing the  
> >"signed
> >root"@IANA will be made clear verbally.
> 
> Yes.