<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <html><head><style type="text/css"></style><title>Re: [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response</title></head><body> <div>In that case, I'll modify my statement to "I'd be happier if #9 was less obtuse (that is, happier if it's intent was more direct or clear).</div> <div><br></div> <div>At 10:33 -0800 11/10/08, Barbara Roseman wrote:</div> <div>Ed, I believe 9 addresses some of the proposed workflows published with the NOI. It was not in either the VeriSign or ICANN proposals, but was, I believe, in some of the other diagrams.<br> <br> -Barb<br> <br> <br> On 11/10/08 10:17 AM, "Edward Lewis" <<a href="">Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz</a>> wrote:<br> </div> <div>At 8:57 +0000 11/10/08, Jim Reid wrote:<br> <br> >can I ask for your support on this latest version?<br> <br> I'd be okay with this, in general, except for two things.<br> <br> #1 - I'd be happier without 9 - I mean, just delete it. (Why is it<br> there? Did someone believe there was a technical justification to<br> add an organization?)<br> <br> #2 - I'd be happier if the list wasn't just a set of requirements but<br> included some "here's a way to do it"s. But then, this point is not<br> critical.<br> <br> >9. There is no technical justification to create a new organisation to<br> >oversee the process of signing of the root.<br> <br> --<br> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<span ></span>=-=-=-<br> Edward Lewis <span ></span > <span ></span > <span ></span > <span ></span> +1-571-434-5468<br> NeuStar<br> <br> Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.</div> <div><br></div> <div><br></div> <x-sigsep><pre>-- </pre></x-sigsep> <div >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<span ></span>-=-=-=-<br> Edward Lewis <span ></span > <span ></span > <span ></span > <span ></span> +1-571-434-5468<br> NeuStar</div> <div><br></div> <div>Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.</div> </body> </html>