This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] [Ext] Re: DNS4EU?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS4EU?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] [Ext] Re: DNS4EU?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Huberman
david.huberman at icann.org
Mon Nov 15 22:12:25 CET 2021
Pardon for top posting. I'm sick and grumpy. In addition the browser vendors, wouldn't regulators be able to define a class of orgs that are ISPs, then make a rule: ISPs must not do DNS resolution for your customers. Instead, you must forward to our resolver or you must announce our resolver's IP addresses in DHCP -- or we will fine you. > On Nov 15, 2021, at 6:57 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:53:20AM +0000, > Michele Neylon - Blacknight via dns-wg <dns-wg at ripe.net> wrote > a message of 119 lines which said: > >> I’d *love* to know how they expect to force anyone to use a specific >> DNS resolver. > > Political pressure on Mozilla so that they use by default the DoH > resolver of DNS4EU? It is not "forcing" (users can still disable it) > but it is close. > > A similar (?) case: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.cira.ca/newsroom/canadian-shield/mozilla-partners-cira-upgrade-canadas-online-privacy-through-firefox__;!!PtGJab4!rsQPs-NAjn6K1r4qkEwgcP071gw7GDTF_y9TYMCGiwQ1xwS3_46fbtYfAuE6__Uc-0VR0mLI6A$ > >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS4EU?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] [Ext] Re: DNS4EU?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]