This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] DNS4EU?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS4EU?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS4EU?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Thu Dec 16 18:05:09 CET 2021
Exactly I’m highly suspicious of it -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: dns-wg <dns-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> Date: Thursday, 16 December 2021 at 17:03 To: Moritz Müller <moritz.muller at sidn.nl> Cc: dns-wg at ripe.net <dns-wg at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [dns-wg] DNS4EU? [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources. Moritz, On Dec 15, 2021, at 11:59 PM, Moritz Müller via dns-wg <dns-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> offering European citizens and private and public organizations the capacity to access the web with a high-quality and free service > I was wondering: Why does the EC believe that the resolvers users currently rely on (e.g. provided by their ISP) provide “low-quality”? Are there any studies about this? My read is that the primary targets of DNS4EU is US-based “Big Tech” (whatever that means), particularly those firms that have a (shall we say) laissez faire attitude towards data privacy. In other words, Google (8.8.8.8). I’d imagine from the perspective of EC folks, DNS4EU would be a no-brainer: support EU-based business, give the finger to Google, give EU law enforcement a potential bone to get around DoH, make “rah rah” noises about EU data sovereignty, and provide, at least theoretically, a way to appease intellectual property lawyers. Since they’re talking about a “federated” service, I suspect ISPs who want to play by the EC’s rules will be considered a part of DNS4EU. Of course, if one were cynical, the question really is when the other shoe (e.g., legal mandates to abide by DNS4EU filtering requirements) will drop. Regards, -drc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20211216/60b91d5e/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS4EU?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS4EU?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]