[dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:
    > I support lowering the TTL on the DS records to 3600.

    > I support lowering the TTL on the NS records - I was going to put my
    > hat in for 21600, but Mr van Dijk's suggestion of 3600 is very
    > enticing.

    > But I liked Mr. Lawrence's suggestion on gathering data on lowering the
    > NS records TTL.  Perhaps the TTL can be lowered from 172800 to 86400 to
    > 21600, then to 3600, collecting data along the way.

Aside from performance/load on the distributing name servers, what else would
you collect?

Or perhaps I am asking: What is your hypothesis, and what kind of data do you
need to prove/disprove it?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20211202/eecf431a/attachment.sig>