This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Wicinski
tjw.ietf at gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 12:49:11 CET 2021
I support lowering the TTL on the DS records to 3600. I support lowering the TTL on the NS records - I was going to put my hat in for 21600, but Mr van Dijk's suggestion of 3600 is very enticing. But I liked Mr. Lawrence's suggestion on gathering data on lowering the NS records TTL. Perhaps the TTL can be lowered from 172800 to 86400 to 21600, then to 3600, collecting data along the way. tim On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:35 AM Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk at powerdns.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 17:07 +0100, Ralf Weber wrote: > > Moin! > > > > On 29 Nov 2021, at 12:59, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > > > > > We propose to lower, in the first quarter of 2022, the TTL on NS > records to 86400 and on DS records to 3600. > > I very much support that and would go even lower for for NS records. > Maybe consider 21600 there. > > Same. I support this, and I also support lowering NS even further, even > to 3600. > > Kind regards, > -- > Peter van Dijk > PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20211202/7925afd4/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]