[dns-wg] DANE goes mainstream?

They don't, sorry. I wrongfully interpreted our stats (100% of encrypted traffic in and out gmail.com) and Google's Transparency Report (https://transparencyreport.google.com/safer-email/overview?hl=en <https://transparencyreport.google.com/safer-email/overview?hl=en>). They seem to use opportunistic encryption, not DANE.

That said, since their encryption levels are beyond 90% inbound and outbound, if/when they turn on DANE, it will be very interesting.


Rubens


> On 8 Apr 2020, at 09:42, Ulrich Wisser via dns-wg <dns-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rubens,
> 
> I wasn't aware of Gmail supporting DANE. Could you point me to some more detailed info on that?
> 
> /Ulrich
> 
> 
> Am Mi., 8. Apr. 2020 um 11:35 Uhr schrieb Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br <mailto:rubensk at nic.br>>:
> 
> 
>> On 8 Apr 2020, at 05:39, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com <mailto:jim at rfc1035.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Microsoft has announced Office 365 Exchange Online is going to support DNSSEC and DANE:
>> 
>> https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/support-of-dane-and-dnssec-in-office-365-exchange-online/ba-p/1275494 <https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/support-of-dane-and-dnssec-in-office-365-exchange-online/ba-p/1275494>
>> 
>> 
> 
> DANE was already mainstream due to Gmail and to german providers, but adding MS is indeed substantial.
> If Zoho also added, we would have all main business collaboration software in check ... https://help.zoho.com/portal/en/community/topic/will-zoho-implement-dane <https://help.zoho.com/portal/en/community/topic/will-zoho-implement-dane>
> 
> 
> Rubens
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20200409/2f7f8bc2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20200409/2f7f8bc2/attachment.sig>