This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Jun 13 10:41:43 CEST 2019
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 09:40:20AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > > > we don't really need this because it's not fixing a problem. > > Indeed. There???s no problem here that needs fixing. > > > ... the RIPE NCC's record for handling dns delegation over the years shows that they're doing a good job and unless this changes, the best thing to do would be to let them continue doing their job as they see fit. > > +1. > > The current mechanism is working just fine. It isn???t broken. +1 Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]