[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

Gert, 


> 
> The time window might be small, but serving wrong answers was not 
> acceptable for us.
> 
> 

ok, but in the automated world of today this small window is likely to
be _really_ small.

> 
> 
> Can you explain why it would be desirable to *have* these unified?
> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster


I do see 3 major benefits to combine/unify these:
- "saving" IP addresses (depending of how many you run of course[1])
- less effort managing (not having multiple places for configuration
thus unifiying [automated] setup)
- saving ressources (servers, virtual machines, whatever they run on)

-
Jonas

[1] reminds me of http ssl virtual host per-ip setups...from time
ago...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20190611/ac9ccc52/attachment.sig>