This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wouter de Vries
w.b.devries at utwente.nl
Mon Apr 29 08:52:04 CEST 2019
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:19:11AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > foo.you:/usr/home/randy> dig a.b.qnamemin-test.internet.nl TXT > a.b.qnamemin-test.internet.nl. 10 IN TXT "HOORAY - QNAME minimisation is enabled on your resolver :)!" > ;; SERVER: 147.28.0.35#53(147.28.0.35) > ;; WHEN: Sat Apr 27 16:58:51 UTC 2019 > > foo.you:/usr/home/randy> dig a.b.qnamemin-test.internet.nl TXT > a.b.qnamemin-test.internet.nl. 10 IN TXT "NO - QNAME minimisation is NOT enabled on your resolver :(" > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Sat Apr 27 17:41:11 UTC 2019 > > so, maybe if it is cached it is not working. > > local server is a bind 9.12.4 auth. recurses locally, but not globally. Interesting, I'm not quite sure how this is happening, we've set the TTL very low (10) so there should be very little caching going on. How did the local server cache the answer from the first request if that went directly to the external recursor? (And why is the cached answer different?) Wouter >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]