This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Sat Apr 27 11:49:21 CEST 2019

On 26 Apr 2019, at 10:02, Mirjam Kuehne wrote:

> Woute de Vries, Moritz Mueller and others did a study on qmin 
> deployment
> and the associated challenges:
>
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wouter_de_vries/make-dns-a-bit-more-private-with-qname-minimisation

In which they mention:
>
> You can test whether your resolver supports qmin by querying the 
> domain below, using the command line tool dig, which relies on the 
> same technique:
>
> dig a.b.qnamemin-test.internet.nl TXT

I really appreciate it when people don't just do the study, but let 
others
know how to confirm that their configuration looks "right" from the 
outside.

Thanks to the authors!

/Niall

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Making the DNS More Private with QNAME Minimisation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]