This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Deletion of ns-v6.ripe.net
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Deletion of ns-v6.ripe.net
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Deletion of ns-v6.ripe.net
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Apr 24 17:28:46 CEST 2018
On 24 Apr 2018, at 16:07, Anand Buddhdev <anandb at ripe.net> wrote: > > Even if we *could* look at the queries, and they showed queries for > "ns-v6.ripe.net", it doesn't mean that the name is in use. Well, I would say that if the name’s in the query traffic, that means it’s “in use”. For some definition of that term. YMMV. >> I’m wondering if the name might still be hard-wired into scripts or >> provisioning/testing tools. > > It may be hard-wired in some scripts, and if so, they may produce an > error. However, it is not used as the target of any NS records that we > are aware of, so I don't expect any major outages. OK. Thanks for that Anand.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Deletion of ns-v6.ripe.net
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Deletion of ns-v6.ripe.net
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]