This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Carlos M. Martinez carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 17:06:15 CEST 2016

Thanks!

> On Jun 28, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
>> It talks about rate limiting, which seems to me is a bit hard to do in a stateless way :-D
> 
> Queue / buffer management does not need to be stateful.  Most
> implementations are stateless, except for flow based queues, which is
> not what's demonstrated here.
> 
> Nick
> 

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]