This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Carlos M. Martinez carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 16:01:17 CEST 2016

It talks about rate limiting, which seems to me is a bit hard to do in a stateless way :-D

> On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:46:17AM -0300,
> Carlos M. Martinez <carlosm3011 at gmail.com> wrote 
> a message of 31 lines which said:
> 
>> I’m sure there are plenty of people that will disagree with me, but,
>> IMO, you should never put stateful devices in front of a DNS
>> server.
> 
> I fully agree but, precisely, this article use stateless filtering.
> 

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]