This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Tue Jun 28 15:16:07 CEST 2016

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:41:51PM +0200,
 Ralf Weber <dns at fl1ger.de> wrote 
 a message of 32 lines which said:

> IMHO this is full of bad ideas and against protocol specs. While I
> agree that at these day and age one must defend against attacks on
> DNS systems, just blindly dropping on packet size or fragments is a
> very bad idea.  Forwarding to 8.8.8.8 also is

I said more or less the same on the RIPE Labs site (comment not yet
moderated).

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Securing Network Infrastructure for DNS Servers

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]