[dns-wg] Request for trusted party to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

Hi Jim,

On 16/07/25 18:49 , Jim Reid wrote:
> 
>> On 25 Jul 2016, at 16:56, Romeo Zwart <romeo.zwart at ripe.net> wrote:

[..]

>> We have tried to make these requirements as clear as possible, including
>> distinctions between mandatory and optional elements, and we have
>> documented those in the document that will be sent on request.
> 
> Great! It’s a pity this isn’t mentioned in the announcement.
> 
>> It would indeed be unrealistic to expect detailed responses based on the
>> limited information that is on the mentioned web page. That is clearly
>> not our expectation.
> 
> I’m glad to hear that Romeo. Though until your recent clarification email, I fear you may well have given prospective bidders that impression.

Thanks for those comments! We will add some clarifying text to the web
page.

Cheers,
Romeo