[dns-wg] RIPE NCC secondary name services for ccTLDs

Dear Romeo,

> At RIPE 68 you, the working group, provided us with some guidelines
> regarding the eligibility of new zones to be added to this service. We
> intend to document these guidelines in the form of a new RIPE Document*,
> of which a draft version is attached to this email.
>
> We welcome any comments you may have on this document.

Thank you for this document. I think it reflects very nicely all the
aspects discussed by the ad-hoc group and by the DNS-WG at RIPE 68.

I have a small comment regarding the first bullet of point 4., which
now reads:
"If the number of delegations in the zone, or in any of its child
  zones, exceeds 10,000..."
I think this clearly refers to any public child zone, i.e. a child zone
that is administered by the ccTLD itself, and not to a delegated zone
managed by a third party. Therefore I suggest adding the word "public"
before "child".

Best regards,
Janos

> Kind regards,
> Romeo Zwart