This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Tue May 5 17:34:57 CEST 2015

On 5 May 2015, at 16:26, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> in the case where two chairs are due to resign in the same year, the
> process for deciding who stands down is still ambiguous.  When this was
> discussed in January, there was some consensus that this should be
> clarified.

See clause 7.

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] a final(?) co-chair selection process

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]