This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Jun 30 16:25:14 CEST 2015
On 30/06/2015 13:50, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: > The .int - only a very small set of organisations could register one, so > there’s absolutely no reason to keep it if it’s not being used. > > The hyphenated domains - is there any “risk” in dropping them? I > sincerely doubt it > > As for the rest - I’ve no strong feelings either way, but holding on to > a bunch of domains “just because” is pointless > > And I wasn’t even aware that RIPE would even need to consult with the > community or members on this kind of administrative matter . . There's no policy requirement, but it's good practice for the NCC to consult with the community for something like this. It keeps one side honest and the other side well-informed. FWIW, I'm in favour of dropping all the inactive / registration protection domains. There are no compelling reasons to keep any of them. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]