This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Call For Presentations RIPE 70, submission deadline 1 March 2015
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Sun Jan 11 23:31:32 CET 2015
On 11/01/2015 19:51, Jim Reid wrote: > "every calendar year" is even simpler and fewer words than that Nick. :-) depends what you're looking for. If it's the simplest and fewest words, then you will probably want: [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years. The main thing is that the wording should not be ambiguous. If you're going to go ahead with the other version, a decision needs to be made about how to decide who gets to resign. Again, the mechanism should be non-ambiguous. Drawing lots is one mechanism, but there are many others. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Call For Presentations RIPE 70, submission deadline 1 March 2015
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]