[dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors

* Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
>>   Let's have RIPE.INT removed.
>
> tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int.
>
> If ICANN has concerns about the delegation, then they should raise them
> formally with the RIPE NCC.

I second that.

And for the DLV issue, I'd like to see any zone, which can't be validated
straight from the root (following the DS chain), ahandles in the following
way:
 1) put the validation info in a DLV (i.e. ISC).
 2) push as hard as possible to get the missing zones signed.
 3) remove the DLV as soon as the DS chain is complete.

And forget about ripen.cc. If you think, this is a geeky idea, apply for the
community TLDs .NCC as well as .RIPE.