This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
manning bill
bmanning at isi.edu
Tue Nov 18 18:42:31 CET 2014
well some people knew about it. however when int was repurposed and went to ICANN, the rir delegations should have all been removed since the reason for existence was moot. that it has remained this long suggests a lack of care /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 18November2014Tuesday, at 9:37, Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:22:00PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote: > > Jim > >> Nobody here knew about ripe.int until recently and it doesn't seem to >> be used. > > Years ago I gave a lecture about DNS system. Part of it, was showing > some examples of domains from non-ccTLDs. ripe.int was the only one > example I have had in my mind at this time. ;-) > > Piotr > > -- > gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski > E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]