[dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> On 18.11.2014 16:34, Jim Reid wrote:
> >On 18 Nov 2014, at 14:59, Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote:
> >> If they want to sit on a domain that bears a resemblance to the
> >> company identity, I'll leave that up to them...
> > 
> > That way lies madness: ripe.$TLD-of-the-week.
> > 
> > IMO one domain name is enough. If someone can make a convincing case
> > to use more than that or why ripe.whatever can achieve something not
> > possible with ripe.net, please speak up.
> 
> I know at least one TLD that serves a completely orthogonal purpose to
> any "regular" TLD - and I am sure you know this one too. :-)
> 
> I'd be almost immediately convinced if the NCC decided to register under
> this particular TLD - for the services that come with it.

I have always believed that this was a kind of an experiment with short
links which was introduced during and then abandoned after the RIPE61 at
ROME:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2010-October/000406.html
https://twitter.com/RIPE_NCC/status/28388254627

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl