This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NCC and others} [Re: RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors]
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NCC and others} [Re: RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors]
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
manning bill
bmanning at isi.edu
Fri Nov 14 00:14:49 CET 2014
i could , since i managed .INT after pvm and before it was given to ICANN /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 13November2014Thursday, at 14:32, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> wrote: > On 11/13/14 2:22 PM, Barbara Roseman wrote: >> ICANN inherited a number of INT registrations when it assumed management of the zone. Since 2005, at least, and probably since 1998, only treaty-based organizations who meet the other criteria have been given registrations, to the best of my knowledge. I believe that ICANN uses an outside expert who has experience with UN treaty organizations to evaluate the requests for .INT registrations. > > FWIW, that policy definitely predates 2003, although I can't speak authoritatively as to how long it was in place before I joined the staff. > > Doug > >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NCC and others} [Re: RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors]
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]