This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Doug Barton
dougb at dougbarton.us
Thu Nov 13 19:05:55 CET 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/13/14 6:54 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: | Dear colleagues, | | Most of the zones that the RIPE NCC signs with DNSSEC have trust | anchors in their parent zones, with the exception of these three | zones: | | 151.76.62.in-addr.arpa ripe.int ripen.cc As others have already pointed out, I would love to see explanations of why the first and third zones cannot have proper trust anchors. The NCC should simply release ripe.int, as the historical reasons for it no longer apply. (FWIW, same goes for apnic.int. None of the other RIRs have similar domains.) Doug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUZPMDAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE3PQIAL1pP7xmGW69C6AC9VzJbupZ 068Dau7lR9RiqXpPPe+sZdpMwXs3Q1Bf+aa8rZ6CNcQw/fTuGYtWd9f9x04DhVgo dIvNctoxSf0PHbGtCqJ/9pb8a+r29wkY67JwKgNy30x5SGg/Z3yMoit49ftD3DqI bMfhWL1037J6YuXz7UnaRWe52OhdbPDVMVO1J9jEV8dWqFcO1DDiP2ATWG3YQQ/l mDSxo7WG9Oja9mgk1zMjldc0NJo1XqmrJRnsy/k6hEkG/F+QJdIWMNH8VDqZC3wB 6l54wvljRgVEbNeZc5ToVGDoWY+nsQ3wJvA+GDkLNjpdzwa1TAXOeoJMP1UT/VM= =vmmW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]