This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
manning bill
bmanning at isi.edu
Thu Nov 13 18:55:00 CET 2014
once, long ago, there was a serious and aggressive move to remove .arpa we moved everything into .int and included the rirs as organizations responsible for the numbers. then it was pointed out that replacing all the resolver libraries might be problematic and DNAME had not been invented… then the IAB decided to repurpose .arpa (changed the name) and ICANN took over .int … but they didn’t do a real good job of cleaning up. so we still have .arpa and .int is strictly treaty orgs (or should be). i guess one could argue RIPE is an offshoot of a treaty org (the EU) /bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 13November2014Thursday, at 7:18, Wilfried Woeber <Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at> wrote: > .int
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]